Pricing, benchmarks, and use-case fit for Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, Mistral, and the open-weight tier — sourced from official provider documentation.
Featured
A head-to-head comparison covering code review, landing-page copy, citation accuracy, recipe writing, and email drafting. Claude leads on five of the seven; the two GPT-5 wins are not small.
Same price as 4.7, a small leaderboard bump, and an honesty gain that catches its own bugs.
OpenAI's gains land in agentic coding and computer use, at roughly double GPT-5's API price.
A real reasoning leap. Watch the long-context bill and how fast a 3.5 Pro could supersede it.
Both charge $5 per million input. Where each one wins after that, and which belongs in your stack.
Anthropic's restricted frontier model, gated under Project Glasswing. What it is and why it's locked away.
Three $20 subscriptions, three default models, scored on four everyday tasks. A clear pick for each user.
Strong on architecture decisions and long-document analysis. Vision is its weaker side.
The visual-design winner. Still strong on math and structured output.
Excels at vision + reasoning. Average elsewhere. Deprecated by Google in March 2026 in favor of 3.1 Pro.
The cheapest model for chat, coding, RAG, agents, classification, and summarization.
Where Llama 4, Mistral Large 2, DeepSeek-V3.1, and Qwen 3 stand against the closed labs.
MMLU is saturated above 90%. The benchmarks worth tracking now.
Claude Opus 4.7, GPT-5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: the reviews, the head-to-head, and a single buying decision.
Llama 4, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen, the small-model tier, and what it takes to self-host.
What AI costs by model and workload, and where teams overspend.
An interactive reference covering pricing, benchmarks, context windows, and capability ratings for all 19 models in the index, across the frontier, mid, and open-weight tiers.
All 19 models ranked by benchr Rating →
benchr